Close this search box.

A/B Testing Vs. Multivariate Testing: Which One Is Better

| |

Simbar Dube

Table of Contents

Join 25,000+ Marketing 

Subscribe to Invesp's blog feed for future articles delivered to your feed reader or receive weekly updates by email.

Guides / AB Testing Guide / AB Vs. Multivariate Testing

When it comes to optimizing your digital assets, knowing whether to use A/B or multivariate testing is key. Are you looking to quickly determine the superior version of a webpage for low-traffic sites?

A/B testing is your go-to. Or do you aim to dissect complex interactions between multiple elements on a high-traffic page? 

Then, A/B and multivariate testing will provide your in-depth analysis. This guide breaks down each method and offers strategic insights into deploying them for maximum conversion optimization.

Key Takeaways

  • A/B testing is ideal for testing two versions of a single variable and requires less traffic, whereas multivariate testing assesses multiple variables and their interactions but needs a higher volume of traffic to provide significant results.

  • A clear, evidence-based hypothesis following the SMART framework is crucial in both A/B and multivariate testing to predict the outcome and define the changes, expected impact, and metrics for measurement.

  • Analyzing testing results requires tools like heatmaps and session recordings to gain actionable insights, with A/B testing focusing on statistical significance and multivariate testing on the interaction between page elements.

Decoding A/B and Multivariate Testing: The Essentials

A/B Testing Vs. Multivariate Testing

Illustration of two variations being compared

Multivariate testing, otherwise known as split testing or A/B testing, is a process used to compare two versions of an online entity to identify which one performs better with the target audience.

It’s highly effective for optimizing various marketing efforts, including emails, newsletters, ads, and website elements. This method is particularly useful when rapid feedback on two distinct designs is needed or if your website does not attract large numbers of visitors.

On another note, multivariate testing takes it up a notch by evaluating multiple page elements simultaneously to uncover the most effective combination that maximizes conversion rates.

Unlike A/B split tests that examine diverse variables individually, multivariate tests investigate how these page components work together and pin down optimal groupings for enhanced site performance. Such intricate experiments require substantially greater levels of web traffic in order to yield statistically significant outcomes.

Ultimately, deciding between using multivariate versus A/B tests hinges on both the complexity associated with what you intend to test and the ease at which either type can be implemented effectively.

The Anatomy of A/B Testing

At its core, A/B testing is about comparison. It involves crafting two different versions of a digital element and evaluating them side by side to determine which one yields better results.

During this process, it’s essential to maintain a controlled environment where each group experiences only one variation while all other variables are kept constant. This approach offers an accurate gauge of how each option performs under actual conditions.

When undertaking A/B testing, the importance of sample size cannot be overstressed. The reliability and accuracy of your findings rest on utilizing an adequately large sample size. It’s vital to ensure that the conclusions you draw genuinely represent user behavior patterns.

Deploying tools such as session recordings can add a qualitative dimension to your evaluation by shedding light on the ways users interact with the different variations put forward in your test.

Multivariate Testing

Visual representation of multivariate testing

Multivariate testing (MVT) is an upgraded version of A/B testing. It tests multiple elements simultaneously to understand how variables interact with each other and focuses on testing multiple elements of the product or landing pages.

Unlike A/B testing, which compares two variations, MVT changes more than one variable to test all resulting combinations simultaneously. It provides a comprehensive view of visitor behavior and preference patterns, making it ideal for testing different combinations of elements or variables.

Some key features of multivariate testing include:

  • Test multiple elements by running multivariate tests, which multivariate testing enables

  • Understanding how variables interact with each other

  • Testing different combinations of elements or variables

  • Providing a comprehensive view of visitor behavior and preference patterns

By using multivariate testing, you can gain valuable insights into how different elements or variables impact user experience and optimize your website or product accordingly.

Nevertheless, the execution of multivariate tests demands a substantial amount of traffic owing to the increased number of variations under examination. This method also has a potential pitfall: the bias towards design.

MVT often focuses excessively on design-related problems while underestimating UI and UX elements that can significantly impact conversion rates.

Crafting a Hypothesis for Effective Testing

Prior to commencing your A/B or multivariate testing, it is imperative to construct a hypothesis. This conjecture about the potential influence of alterations on user behavior is crucial for executing substantive tests. An articulate hypothesis will include:

  • The specific modification under examination

  • The anticipated effect of this modification

  • The measurement that will be employed to evaluate said effect

  • It must be evidence-based and provide justification.

A cogent hypothesis embraces the SMART criteria: Specificity, Measurability, Actionability, Relevance, and Testability.

It integrates both quantitative data and qualitative insights to guarantee that the supposition is not only grounded in reality but also predicated upon hard facts and pertinent to the variables being examined.

Identifying Variables for Your Test

Selecting the correct multiple variables to assess in a multivariate experiment is crucial. Each variable should have solid backing based on business objectives and expected influence on outcomes. When engaging in testing involving multiple variables, it’s essential to rigorously evaluate their possible effect and likelihood of affecting targeted results.

Variation ideas for inclusion in multivariate testing ought to stem from an analysis grounded in data, which bolsters their potential ability to affect conversion rates positively. Adopting this strategy ensures that the selected variables are significant and poised to yield insightful findings.

Designing Your Experiment: A/B vs. Multivariate

Choosing between A/B testing and multivariate testing depends on various considerations, such as the amount of traffic, the complexity involved, and specific goals for the test.

When there’s a limited flow of traffic that might not support a complex multivariate test, A/B testing serves as an ideal solution due to its straightforward setup and unambiguous outcomes. In contrast, even though setting up a multivariate test takes more effort, and it takes longer to deliver findings, they offer far-reaching detailed insights.

Once you have established your hypothesis and identified which elements will be included in the multivariate test, creating different variations becomes the next vital phase.

It’s important to tackle this process with meticulous attention and well-thought-out strategies so that you can ensure your multivariate tests produce significant results.

Setting Up A/B Tests

To implement an A/B testing protocol, one must:

  1. Develop a variation alongside the control version.

  2. Evaluate both versions to identify which is more effective.

  3. Distribute your sample randomly into two segments to assess the performance of the control version relative to that of its counterpart.

  4. By doing so, you minimize any distortion in outcomes due to external influences.

It is critical during an A/B test setup that there are enough participants involved to ensure results that are statistically significant and accurate. Sessions can be harnessed as they offer qualitative feedback on user engagement with each variant throughout the course of A/B tests.

Preparing for a Multivariate Test

Illustration of preparing for a multivariate test

Illustration of preparing for a multivariate test

Preparation for a multivariate test calls for more extensive groundwork. You’ll need to:

  1. Create multiple versions of elements to test, considering elements that might significantly influence user behavior and conversions.

  2. Prioritize site elements with significant impact.

  3. Avoid an excessive number of variations by naming them clearly and reducing variables to the most essential ones.

Implement trigger settings to specify when variations appear to users, and use fractional factorial testing to manage traffic distribution among variations. During the multivariate test, systematically evaluate the impact of variations and consider eliminating low-performing ones after reaching the minimum sample size.

Analyzing Test Outcomes for Data-Driven Decisions

The analysis phase is a crucial element in both A/B and multivariate testing strategies. When conducting A/B tests, it’s essential to calculate the proper sample size and duration of the test to attain statistical significance, ensuring that outcomes are reliable.

An even distribution of web traffic across different variations is critical for attracting an adequate volume of visitors without biasing the results.

For a thorough assessment of user interactions post-A/B and multivariate testing sessions:

  • Heatmaps

  • Click maps

  • Session recordings

  • Form Analytics

They serve as indispensable tools. They enable you to observe real-time engagement metrics as well as dissect and comprehend findings after reaching statistical significance in an A/B test.

Making Sense of Multivariate Test Data

The interpretation of multivariate test data calls for a distinct methodology. In multivariate testing, evaluating the collective impact of various page elements on user behavior and conversion rates is essential, rather than examining elements in isolation. This method provides comprehensive insights on how different elements interact, allowing teams to discover effects between variables that could lead to further optimization.

When assessing multivariate test data, it is necessary to:

  • Identify the combinations of page elements that lead to the highest conversions

  • Recognize elements that contribute least to the site’s conversions

  • Discover the best possible combinations of tested page elements

  • Increase conversions

  • Identify the right combination of components that produces the highest conversion rate.

This process helps optimize your website’s performance and improve your conversion rate through conversion rate optimization.

Optimizing Your Strategy Post-Testing

After analyzing the test results, it’s essential to refine your approach. It is important to evaluate how each variation performed in the tests, as this will reveal which modifications enhanced user behavior and conversion rates. Implementing the winning variation effectively ensures that its beneficial effects on key business metrics are fully realized.

Dissecting each element and characteristic within multivariate tests provides valuable insights for making educated decisions regarding upcoming improvements in design and customer engagement. This advanced knowledge of what resonates with your audience allows you to sharpen your strategy. And elevate your outcomes.

Implementing Winning Variations

Multivariate Tests

Implementing the winning variations derived from your tests is essential for optimization. It involves continuous improvement through regular refinement of strategies based on multivariate test outcomes, leading to increasingly better results over time. To create variations effectively, implementation requires removing underperforming variations and directing more traffic toward the winning variations that demonstrate potential.

However, avoiding contradictory messaging or designs that harm the user experience is important. Implementing too many changes too quickly can increase bounce rates. Remember, the goal is to attract users and engage them effectively. That’s why placing elements at the right location on a webpage is crucial for capturing attention and increasing conversions.

Learning and Iterating

The approach encompasses not only the execution of tests, but also demands continual learning and strategic adjustments based on those test outcomes. Neglecting this iterative process can hinder your ability to uncover successful resolutions for pinpointed issues. Leverage insights gathered from experimentation to boost other page element’s efficiency.

Ongoing A/B testing yields guidance on how to enhance performance while pinpointing aspects of a marketing strategy that might require refinement or removal altogether. It is important to recognize that poor record-keeping of both the methodology and findings from A/B tests could significantly constrain opportunities for learning derived from each experiment.

Consequently, it is vital to meticulously document every step taken and the results obtained during these procedures for subsequent review and use.

Common Pitfalls in A/B and Multivariate Testing

Multivariate testing can yield great insights, but it’s imperative to avoid certain missteps. One key error is failing to accumulate sufficient traffic for test results to reach statistical significance. This rush could lead to conclusions that are not reliable. Overlooking external influences such as seasonal trends or shifts in the market can distort what the data reflects and skew results.

Technical factors must also be considered—like how a testing tool might affect website speed—which could alter accurate observations of user behavior and corrupt test findings. It is fundamental for these experiments to mirror actual user interactions with precision, hence ensuring your tools do not disrupt this reflection is essential.

Scaling Success: From Single Tests to a Culture of Experimentation

Transitioning from individual test successes to a culture of experimentation represents a significant paradigm shift. This requires:

  • Nurturing employee curiosity

  • Seeing failures as valuable learning opportunities

  • Setting strategic experimental goals

  • Ensuring the provision of necessary resources

  • Acting as role models by embracing outcomes from various testing efforts.

To foster successful innovation strategies, an organization’s culture should value data above opinions and implement changes only after thorough experimentation.

Key elements in scaling experimentation successfully include:

  • Valuing data above opinions

  • Implementing changes only after thorough experimentation

  • Democratizing the testing process, allowing any employee to initiate tests without prior management approval.

And finally, to encourage a transparent and collaborative experimentation environment, organizations should employ a central repository to document and share the results and learnings from past experiments.


A/B and multivariate testing are potent methods that can transform the way you approach digital marketing. By comparing different variations, whether it’s two in A/B testing or multiple in multivariate testing, you can gain valuable insights into what resonates with your audience.

The key is to embrace a culture of experimentation, valuing data over opinions, and constantly learning from your tests. Through this approach, you can optimize your strategy, boost your results, and ultimately drive your business forward.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between A/B and multivariate testing?

Multivariate testing distinguishes itself from A/B testing by evaluating various elements at the same time in order to determine which combination yields the most favorable results, as opposed to A/B testing which only contrasts two variations.

Recognizing this distinction will assist you in determining the appropriate method for your particular experimentation requirements.

When should I use A/B testing over multivariate testing?

When swift outcomes are needed from evaluating two distinct designs, or when your website experiences low traffic volumes, A/B testing is the method to employ.

On the other hand, if your intention is to examine several variations at once, multivariate testing could be a better fit for such purposes.

What factors should I consider when setting up an A/B test?

When setting up an A/B test, it’s crucial to consider the sample size for reliable results and precision, control the testing environment, and use tools for qualitative insights like session recordings. These factors will ensure the accuracy and effectiveness of your test.

How can I effectively analyze multivariate test data?

To thoroughly assess data from multivariate tests, consider how different combinations of page elements together influence user behavior and ultimately conversion rates. Determine which specific sets of page elements result in the most significant increase in conversions, while also noting which individual components contribute the least to overall site conversions.

What common mistakes should I avoid when conducting A/B and multivariate tests?

Ensure that you allow sufficient traffic to accumulate in order to reach statistical significance. It’s important to factor in external variables such as seasonal variations or shifts in the marketplace, and also be mindful of technical elements like how testing instruments might affect website performance. Overlooking these considerations may result in deceptive test outcomes and false interpretations, which could squander both time and investment.